Most goal-setting advice tells you to visualize success. Picture yourself crossing the finish line. Imagine the promotion, the completed manuscript, the healthier body. This positive visualization feels motivating—and that's precisely why it can backfire.
Decades of experimental research reveal a counterintuitive finding: positive fantasies about the future can actually sap the energy needed to achieve goals. The brain sometimes treats vivid imagination as partial accomplishment, reducing the urgency to act.
But the solution isn't pessimism. It's a specific cognitive strategy called mental contrasting—holding positive outcomes and realistic obstacles in mind simultaneously. The experimental evidence for this approach is substantial, and understanding why it works can transform how you pursue goals.
Beyond Positive Thinking
Gabriele Oettingen's research team ran a telling experiment with college students. Participants were asked to fantasize about their upcoming week. Those who indulged in purely positive fantasies—imagining everything going smoothly—reported feeling good in the moment. But they subsequently felt less energized and accomplished less than those who had more tempered expectations.
This pattern replicates across domains. In studies on weight loss, students who fantasized most positively about slimming down lost fewer pounds over time. Job seekers who fantasized most vividly about landing positions received fewer offers. The dreamers felt good while dreaming but did worse in reality.
The mechanism appears to be energetic. Positive fantasies produce a kind of mental consummation—the brain gets some of the reward without the work. Blood pressure studies show that positive visualization actually lowers systolic blood pressure, a physiological marker associated with relaxation rather than mobilization for action.
This doesn't mean optimism is harmful. The key distinction is between expectations (judgments about what will likely happen) and fantasies (mental images of desired outcomes). High expectations predict success. But when fantasies are decoupled from realistic assessment, they can tranquilize rather than energize.
TakeawayPositive visualization feels motivating precisely because it provides partial reward—which can reduce the drive needed to earn the full reward through action.
The WOOP Framework
Mental contrasting follows a specific protocol, now formalized as WOOP: Wish, Outcome, Obstacle, Plan. The sequence matters. You identify a meaningful goal, vividly imagine the best outcome, then immediately shift to visualizing the main internal obstacle, and finally form an if-then plan to address it.
Experimental tests consistently show this combination outperforms its components. In one study, mid-level managers underwent either mental contrasting training, reverse contrasting (obstacles first, then outcomes), or visualization of outcomes alone. Two weeks later, only the mental contrasting group showed improvements in time management, decision-making, and project completion.
The conditions for effectiveness are specific. Mental contrasting works when people have high expectations of success—when they believe the goal is achievable but challenging. For goals perceived as impossible, mental contrasting helps people disengage wisely rather than waste resources. For goals perceived as trivially easy, the technique adds little.
The obstacle identification must focus on internal barriers: your own habits, fears, competing priorities, or tendencies. External obstacles matter, but internal ones are what mental contrasting targets. This isn't about anticipating every problem—it's about confronting what in yourself might derail progress.
TakeawayMental contrasting requires a specific sequence—positive outcome first, then obstacle—and works best when success is believable but not guaranteed.
Mechanism of Action
Why does this particular sequence work? Cognitive research suggests mental contrasting creates a strong associative link between the present reality (with its obstacles) and the desired future. This association energizes goal pursuit by highlighting the gap between where you are and where you want to be.
Brain imaging studies show that mental contrasting activates working memory regions more intensely than either positive visualization or obstacle focus alone. The cognitive effort of holding both elements simultaneously appears to strengthen commitment and prepare executive functions for the work ahead.
The motivational effect operates through what researchers call necessity—the sense that action is required to bridge the gap between reality and desire. Pure positive fantasy can create a premature sense of accomplishment. Mental contrasting preserves the emotional pull of the goal while binding it to an action-readiness state.
The if-then planning component (the 'P' in WOOP) further enhances effectiveness by automating responses to anticipated obstacles. When you specify 'If I encounter X, I will do Y,' you're offloading future decisions to environmental cues. Studies show these implementation intentions roughly double the probability of following through on goals.
TakeawayMental contrasting works by strengthening the associative link between current reality and desired future, creating a cognitive state of necessity that mobilizes action.
The research on mental contrasting offers a clear practical lesson: neither optimism nor pessimism alone supports effective goal pursuit. What works is the deliberate oscillation between positive future and present obstacle.
This isn't about dampening enthusiasm or dwelling on problems. It's about creating the cognitive conditions for sustained effort—holding the goal's appeal while honestly confronting what stands in the way.
The evidence suggests a simple protocol worth testing: spend time imagining your best outcome, then immediately confront your main internal obstacle, and form a specific plan for when it arises. The combination appears more powerful than any element alone.